top of page
Search


JOHN DEERE BULLDOZES PATENT COMPLAINT: HOW PLAINTIFFS PLED THEMSELVES OUT OF COURT WITH PREJUDICE
“ In patent litigation, what you allege can and will be used against you. . . .” I. INTRODUCTION In patent litigation, the line between sufficient pleading and pleading yourself out of court can be razor thin. David’s Dozer V-Loc System Inc. and inventor David Armas (collectively, “plaintiffs”) learned this lesson the hard way when their detailed allegations—accepted as true—demonstrated that John Deere’s (“Deere”) products could not infringe their patent. On October 9,
York Faulkner
Oct 2420 min read


THE “PAPER NDA” PROBLEM: WHEN BIFURCATION OF RICO AND PATENT CLAIMS DEFEATS HATCH-WAXMAN’S PURPOSE
“. . . The fraud case is prerequisite to the patent case . . . .” I. INTRODUCTION In mid-June 2025, attorneys for plaintiffs Janssen Products and PharmaMar were reviewing their opponent’s document production in a routine Hatch-Waxman patent case when they stumbled across something that shouldn't exist: their own clients' highly confidential regulatory filings . Not summaries. Not publicly available information. But instead, substantive portions of the proprietary specific
York Faulkner
Oct 1728 min read


The Vanishing $10 Million Verdict in Rex Medical v. Intuitive Surgical
“The math is stark: infringement victory + validity win + $10 million jury award = $1, if you cannot apportion value to the patented...
York Faulkner
Oct 524 min read
Legal Notice - YMF Law does not practice Japanese law, and the statements presented on the pages of this website are provided for informational purposes only and are not intended to be relied upon as legal advice.
bottom of page
